Table 1 demonstrates the descriptive results with reliability indices. Although several scales have significantly correlated, they all have weak associations. The model had acceptable fit (CFI = 0.941, TLI = 0.928, RMSEA = 0.043, [90% CI = 0.0380.048]). The strongest predictor of problematic Tinder use was self-esteem enhancement motivation (? = 0.37, p < .001).>

Dining table 1.

The mediational model of personality traits, Tinder-use motivations and problematic Tinder use (Study 2). Note. All variables presented in ellipses are latent variables. For the sake of clarity, indicator variables related to latent variables and correlations between the variables were not depicted in this figure. One-headed arrows represent standardized regression weights. The non-significant pathways were not depicted on the figure for the sake of simplicity; *p < .05.>

Earlier in the day degree claimed strong contacts anywhere between reasonable thinking-respect and you can difficult on line behaviors since the profiles wish to increase their self-respect by means of the fresh new virtual ecosystem (elizabeth.g., Armstrong et al., 2000; Yang & Tung, 2007). With respect to the introduce results, brand new care about-value enhancing motivation out-of Tinder have fun with takes on an important role when you look at the difficult Tinder use. Along with the criterion, like and sex motives together with looked like of the problematic Tinder play with. not, in the event of these reasons, the links have been weaker in contrast to care about-admiration enhancement motivation. Continue reading →