Blake v. Family Offers & Loan, 2010 Ohio 2689 (Ohio App. 6/3/2010)

Blake is attractive the fresh summation judgment choice of Columbiana County Courtroom from Prominent Pleas out of Blake’s action against House Offers & Financing Co

apps that give a cash advance

< 1> This timely appeal comes for consideration upon the record in the trial court and the parties ‘ briefs. Pro-se Appellant , Veronica A. , and New England Square Condominium Association , and Home Savings’ counterclaim against Blake and third party defendants Richard E. Whitley , Heritage Title Agency, Inc. , and Columbiana County Treasurer .

< 2> Blake’s claims against all parties , as well as her defenses against Home Savings’ counterclaim, were predicated on her allegation that she did not have valid title to her condominium property. On appeal, Blake argues that the trial court erred in finding that her property was not originally and irrevocably dedicated to public use by the original developer, Sitler Construction, Inc. Blake also argues that the trial court erroneously found that Blake owned her property in fee simple, because there was an encumbrance on her property. Finally, Blake argues that the trial court should not have granted Home Savings’ foreclosure via summary judgment, because Blake presented an issue of material fact regarding the validity of her title to the property, and therefore regarding the validity of the mortgage.

The brand new demo court is why choice declined Blake’s activity getting summary wisdom , granted Appellee Family Savings’ motion having conclusion view , dismissed Blake’s complaint, discover Blake and you may Whitley inside the default to their promissory note, and you can bought a property foreclosure into the Blake’s mortgage

< 3> The partial documentation of plats and declarations provided by Blake in the proceedings below do not indicate that her property or the lot on which it is located was ever dedicated by Sitler for public use. Continue reading